|
Newsclips
Stories
of interest from other publications
Commonwealth
Magazine
Fall 2001
Not-so
Green Acres
Franklin
County, the state's most rural territory, is
pre- and post-industrial at the same time.
That makes life in the country no walk in the park.
By
B.J. Roche
Every
now and then I'll be talking to my friend Jack, who works
in Boston and lives in Newton, and he'll say: "So, when are
you moving back to civilization?" By "civilization," of course,
he means inside the Route 128 ring, where golf courses and
cemeteries count as open space. Where buyers actually pay
more than the asking price for a home. Where a 10-mile commute
can take 45 minutes. In short, he means everything that Franklin
County, where I live, is not.
One
hundred miles out Route 2 from Boston, Franklin County couldn't
be more different from the territory east of I-495. About
71,500 people live in 26 towns spread over 725 square miles,
making Franklin the state's most rural county. Easterners
often call this region the Berkshire Hills, which irks the
locals to no end (it's the Hoosacs, stupid), and its rivers,
forests, and farmland make it one of the prettiest parts of
the state.
The
mindset is different out here, too: a combination of Yankee
pragmatism and hippie high-mindedness that is sometimes irritating,
but more often refreshing. If the newest status symbol in
the Boston suburbs is the Cadillac sports utility vehicle
with two television screens in the back seat, out here, a
much-requested song on WRSI-FM, the local radio station, is
Mem Shannon's "Those SOBs In Their SUVs."
No
question, Franklin County is an anachronism. It doesn't have
a real mall, and the only major department store, Wilson's,
has anchored downtown Greenfield, the county seat, for decades.
Years back, a group of locals fought off a Wal-Mart as though
it were a 250,000-head hog farm. You won't see a single Starbucks
or Applebees, but we do have one of the last operating Howard
Johnson restaurants. And there are lots of local coffee purveyors
and mom-and-pop lunch counters; small businesses are the mainstay
of the region's economy. And, despite a growth spurt in tiny
but upscale towns like Leverett and Conway, compared to most
places, there's still plenty of room. Three-quarters of the
county is forest land, and most towns have populations of
fewer than 3,000 people.
All
of which makes for the good life. Unless, of course, you have
to make a living. Salaries, too, remain in a time warp. In
the 1990s, the county had the lowest per capita income in
the state for five consecutive years. Earnings here remain
at the bottom of state's 14 counties, documented at $23,779
in 1997, compared to a statewide average of $31,239.
It
wasn't always this way. The hill towns once had thriving factories,
and Greenfield was a world leader in the machine tool industry.
Greenfield Tap and Die employed more than 3,500 at its peak
during World War II. But while other manufacturing regions
have recovered somewhat since the decline of the 1960s and
'70s, Franklin County never really did. The smaller machine
and plastics shops that remain are doing well. But most high-paying
factory jobs have either disappeared altogether or been replaced
by service jobs. The residue of a tough economy shows itself
in social indicators: Reported incidents of child abuse are
higher than in other parts of the state, as is the poverty
rate.
That
may not be of much concern to the growing number of newcomers
moving here to escape the sprawl and high housing costs to
the south in Hampshire County. But a slow economy is a problem
for those who have grown up here and would like to stay. So
the question going forward for Franklin County is: How much
to change, and how much to stay the same?
Return
of the tourists
One
hundred years ago, on a summer morning in the tiny mountain
town of Monroe Bridge, workers would be filing into the James
Ramage Paper Mill, a two-story hulking brick building that
overlooked the Deerfield River, whose waters powered the mill.
Today, only rust and rot are at work here; the action is down
below in the river itself, which, on weekends, is filled with
kayakers and rafters who have come to ride the waters of the
Deerfield.
In
the mid-1990s, environmentalist and outdoor recreation enthusiasts
negotiated an agreement with federal regulators that mandated
summertime water releases from the dams along the Deerfield.
In the process, they gave life to a new industry along the
river: tourism. Fishermen and hunters had long known the secrets
of the Deerfield, but now they share the river with weekend
kayakers and tubers, as well as companies like Zoar Outdoors
and Crabapple Rafting, which run several hundred visitors
down the river each weekend in huge rubber rafts.
In
some ways, this is a return to the tourism heydays of the
1940s and '50s, when tourists clogged the stretch of Route
2 known as the Mohawk Trail. Back then, visitors parked their
station wagons at small cabin colonies, dined at the Sweetheart
Restaurant, and posed for pictures in front of the Indian
souvenir shops. Today's tourists are more likely to drive
Jeep Cherokees bearing kayaks and expensive touring bicycles.
Economic
development officials are betting on the future of tourism
in the area; after all, thousands of cars pass through Franklin
County on their way to Vermont each year. And the flagship
store of Yankee Candle Company in South Deerfield is one of
the state's most popular tourist destinations. But there are
scant accommodations beyond the Motel 6 level. And not all
efforts to pander to the passers-by pan out: An upscale restaurant-and-shopping
complex built by Lunt Silversmiths to lure tourists off I-91
and into Greenfield closed in February.
For
now, Franklin County residents depend heavily on the public
and nonprofit sector for work. The largest employer of Franklin
County residents is actually in Hampshire County: the University
of Massachusetts-Amherst. Second is Franklin County Medical
Center. While there are still lots of small machine shops
and plastics operations, the largest private employer is Lightlife
Foods, which makes tofu and employs about 160 people.
"There
are no 4,000-employee companies, but there are a bunch of
companies that employ between one and two hundred, and that's
probably not a bad thing for an area like this," says John
Waite, director of the Franklin County Community Development
Corp. Waite and others say the fact that Franklin County never
got in on a boom insulates it a little bit from the busts.
But he says investment capital is hard to come by, particularly
on a region-appropriate scale.
"What
we have here is people who need $25,000 to $50,000, up to
a half-million dollars. They don't need millions," says Waite.
"And venture capital people are always looking for million
dollar deals because that's where there's a payoff."
There's
a real split between those who would preserve
the farmland and those who would build factories.
If
a company needs a place to build, that could also be a problem,
and not necessarily because of physical limitations, but political
ones. There's a real split in Franklin County between those
who want to preserve the remaining farmland--the flat, wide-open
space that is perfect for development--and those who want
to build facilities that could provide new jobs. After months
of controversy, planners in Greenfield recently rejected a
move to rezone a parcel of farmland near Greenfield Community
College for an office park.
What
the county does have is plenty of old mill space, which can
be an asset or an albatross. Greenfield is in the process
of deciding the fate of the old Greenfield Tap and Die factory,
a rundown complex of buildings on the outskirts of the downtown.
Brownfields money is available for cleanup of former industrial
sites, but not for renovation, and because of the lower rents
in this region, it's tough finding investors willing to take
a gamble.
Bothered
by bandwidth
Jeff
Potter is the kind of small businessman the economic-development
suits love and urban boomers envy. Brainy and energetic, Potter
is doing work he enjoys in a picturesque setting, overlooking
the Deerfield River in the small village of Shelburne Falls.
Potter, 34, grew up in Plainfield, and graduated from Middlebury
College. He and his wife Susan live in town and are active
members of the local business association. Potter likes small
town life and the camaraderie of the local business community.
His
company, Potter Publishing, employs five people, providing
editorial design services for companies like Taunton Press
in Connecticut and McGraw-Hill in Boston. From a couple of
office suites in an old building not far from the Bridge of
Flowers, Potter Publishing works on 30 projects at a time.
"Fifteen
years ago, I would have had to be in Boston or New York to
do this kind of work," he says. "The Internet has been a great
equalizer."
But
not as much of an equalizer as it could be. As his work has
grown more sophisticated in the five years since he moved
here, the telecommunications services he relies on have not
kept up. Potter's been struggling for months to get high-speed
Internet access for his offices. At home, he has AT&T
Broadband, but he can't get it at work. So when he has large
files to send clients, he loads them onto his laptop and runs
home to send them from there.
It's
a familiar complaint. As professionals and small business
owners in the county have become more 'Net-savvy, they've
run into a bandwidth bottleneck. The joke in my house is that
you can clean the kitchen while waiting for a Web page to
download. But for entrepreneurs like Potter, it's no joke.
He compares the urban-rural inequities in telecommunications
to those that existed before rural electrification in the
1930s. For customers, it's nearly impossible to get high-speed
access at a reasonable price. For providers, it's a problem
of critical mass: not enough subscribers to make the investment
worthwhile.
The
problem is endemic to the Massachusetts hinterlands. Businesses
in neighboring Berkshire County struggled for years to get
high speed Internet. Then they took matters into their own
hands, forming a public-private partnership called Berkshire
Connects, which grouped customers together to negotiate a
contract with a provider. Teaming up with its neighbor to
the south, Franklin County is following suit: Franklin-Hampshire
Connect is looking at proposals from several companies to
bring the region into the high-speed Internet age.
"Location
is becoming less important for some businesses, but then you'd
better be wired," says Waite. "If you're not centrally located,
you'd better be at least connected, and today we're neither."
Milk
goes boutique
Poet
Archibald MacLeish, who made his home in Conway, once described
the hills of Franklin County as being "of human scale," and
he got that just right. While the rich soils of the Connecticut
River Valley are perfect for crops like asparagus and tobacco,
the rocky hills of Franklin County are good for nothing but
dairy and haying, with the odd lumber mill here and there.
Farmers
make money two ways. They can produce a huge amount of a particular
crop, or they can diversify into such businesses as haying,
maple syrup, and "value added" products. Since taking over
as state agriculture commissioner in 1993, Jonathan "Jay"
Healy has been emphasizing the latter method, particularly
in Franklin County.
"In
the global economy, you're competing with people
who pay a buck a day to apple pickers in Chile."
"Profit
margins are 15 times as much for an ice cream cone as they
are for a truckload of milk," Healy says. "In the global economy,
you're competing with people who pay a buck a day to apple
pickers in Chile."
Healy,
who grew up on a 100-year-old family farm on a truly sublime
stretch along the Deerfield River in Charlemont, practices
what he preaches. He runs his own sawmill on the weekends,
milling timber from the forest on his own land into custom-ordered
beams for far-off trophy homes in Nantucket or Burlington,
Vt. When we built an addition on our house this year, my husband
chain-sawed down a 25-foot oak tree from our own land, then
had Healy mill it into flooring. (Try that in Newton.)
A
cooperative of eight small farms, mostly in Franklin County,
has capitalized on concerns about the bovine growth hormone,
or BGH, by turning a commodity--milk --into a value-added
product. In doing so, they have given the local dairy industry
a new lease on life.
Debbie
Barton-Duprey, 46, and her husband David Duprey, 47, took
over Sunbrite Farms in Bernardston, David's family's farm,
in 1980 and soon found themselves on a downward cycle: The
costs of producing milk kept going up, while the prices they
were getting for their milk kept dropping. And the Dupreys
were not alone. "A lot of us were at the point of giving up,"
says Duprey.
But
a group of dairy farmers came upon the idea of marketing milk
they produce without using BGH. The synthetic hormone, which
boosts milk production in cows, has been widely used in the
dairy industry since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration
in 1993. But the drug has been controversial, and these farmers
saw an opportunity to peddle hormone-free milk directly to
consumers.
The
state Department of Food and Agriculture provided a $12,500
grant to write a business plan and pay for the design of the
carton, which features profiles of the farm families who participate.
A gallon of Family Farms milk can cost up to 50 cents more
than whatever's on sale at the local Kwik-Mart. But the milk
tastes good, and four years after they first began selling
the brand, "we're all still farming," says Barton-Duprey,
the co-op's secretary. That's more than many Massachusetts
farmers can say.
The
co-op sells 1 percent, 2 percent, skim, and whole milk to
about 80 retail outlets, mostly in the Pioneer Valley, and
sales have increased steadily in each of the first four years
of operation, to gross sales of $1 million last year. Annual
income of the member farms has increased 10 percent since
they began selling the milk. Despite their success, Duprey
says that the group has no plans to expand beyond western
Massachusetts, preferring to keep their product local.
The
farms have also been helped by the Northeast Dairy Compact,
which sets a minimum price processors must pay farmers, though
whether the dairy price support program would continue past
its expiration on September 30 is unclear (see "Uncertain
Future," sidebar).
| UNCERTAIN
FUTURE FOR DAIRY PRICE PROTECTION
Implemented
by Congress in 1997, the Northeast Dairy Compact established
a minimum price that could be paid to New England's
farmers for so-called Class 1 milk--the milk we drink.
Many farmers here had been spending more to produce
milk than they could sell it for. But under the compact,
$146.4 million has been funneled to farmers in the
six New England states, with an average annual total
payment to Massachusetts farmers of about $13,000.
Funding for the compact comes from the market: consumers,
farmers, processors, and retailers. But after the
compact expired on September 30, it became unclear
whether the dairy price-protection plan would be renewed
on Capitol Hill.
Dan
Smith, executive director of the compact, based in
Montpelier, Vt., says the compact has helped preserve
New England's family farms, ensuring a local supply
of fresh milk and keeping the kind of working landscape
that both residents and visitors value. It's been
especially helpful in Vermont, where 90 percent of
the farms are dairy. In Massachusetts, where farms
are more diversified, the compact slowed the rate
of decline of family farms by about half, according
to agricultural commissioner Jay Healy. And while
some politicians are trying to kill the Northeast
Dairy Compact, five states are trying to join it.
Fourteen southern states are also are trying to create
their own.
Opposition
to the compact comes from large milk processors and
midwestern congressmen, who say it's a subsidy that
gouges consumers and gives New England farmers an
unfair economic advantage. Critics blame the compact
for higher milk prices, but a study by the University
of Connecticut last spring found that money going
to processors and retailers accounts for more of the
price premium in New England than the mandated payments
to farmers.
In
the end, the compact's future hinges as much on politics
as on public policy. Vermont Sen. James Jeffords,
the former Republican who turned Independent this
summer and threw his support to Senate Democrats,
causing a headache for the White House, is one of
the compact's biggest boosters. One of its biggest-spending
opponents, milk processing giant Suiza, is based in
Texas. Like his brethren from the Midwest, Senate
Majority Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota has long
opposed compacts. Now that he owes his position to
Jeffords, however, he may think differently.
Smith,
who has been with the compact since the beginning,
remains optimistic about congressional reauthorization,
even though it didn't happen by September 30. "Certainly
it can be done by the end of the year," says Smith."It's
working," he says of the compact. "How often do they
get to pass something they can say that about?"
But
Healy is not so sure, especially now that the World
Trade Center disaster has preempted all other issues.
"I
thought for a long time, they'd cut a deal, and let
New England keep it, but not expand to other states.
With the New York tragedy and the wild card of Jeffords,
I'm getting pessimistic," says Healy. "It's getting
bleaker and bleaker, but it's Bush, Lott, and politics.
It's way above us."
--B.J.
ROCHE |
"Before
the compact, we were literally on a rollercoaster," says Barton-Duprey.
"We never knew how much we'd be paid. We always knew the insurance,
grain bill, and utilities were going up, but we never knew
how much we'd get paid for milk. Now we're guaranteed a certain
price, and I never hear any of the gloom and doom that I used
to hear. It's helped stabilize the farm."
Suburban
hopes, rural realities
Local
officials hope a few more success stories will come out of
the Western Massachusetts Food Processing Center, a food production
incubator scheduled to open in the Greenfield Industrial Park
in September. The $800,000 facility, which was built with
state and federal funds, is outfitted with a state-of-the-art
commercial kitchen and all sorts of packaging equipment. In
this incubator space, small businesses can get started producing
and marketing food products. About 40 producers have expressed
interest in the center, says community-development corporation
director Waite, and they're hoping Franklin County can match
the success Vermont has had with its niche food businesses.
Barton-Duprey
also credits other programs, like the "Local Heroes" campaign
by Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture, a nonprofit
group supported by a Kellogg Foundation grant that promotes
buying local produce, for keeping farmers on the land. "People
appreciate agriculture," she says."Everyone out here knows
how hard a farmer works. I don't think you're taken for granted."
But
there can be tensions between those who work the land and
those who view it as a backdrop. In one town, eco-conscious
residents have tried to stop a farmer from haying to protect
the nesting bobolinks, birds that migrate to New England each
spring from South America. The dilemmas are real: Should we
shoot the coyotes and bears or let them kill the chickens
and raid the cow corn?
"People
move to the country because they want to live in the country,
but then they complain when the farmer's spreading manure,"
says Jane Davis, town administrator in Leverett, one of Franklin
County's wealthiest and fastest-growing towns. "The view comes
with the smells, guys. What do you think makes the fields
green?"
Indeed,
the intrusion of suburban values--and expectations--may be
as big a threat to the rural way of life as any. Davis, who
lives in the farm town of Northfield, says small towns are
under increasing pressure from newcomers to offer the services
they got used to in suburbia: top-notch schools with varied
course offerings, state-of-the-art libraries. "They want the
country experience, but when it comes to inconveniences there's
a problem," she says.
Most
towns have little industrial or commercial development to
tap as a revenue base, so homeowners--and land-rich, cash-poor
farmers--foot the bill. Leverett's tax rate this year is likely
to hit $21 per $1,000 of valuation, almost up to the state
limit, says Davis. Mounting property taxes, in turn, put more
pressure on farmers to sell to developers--which means more
homes, more kids to educate, and more suburban expectations.
Some
farmers have been hard pressed to resist the rising real estate
values that come with proximity to UMass or I-91. Between
1987 and 1997, the county lost 7,730 acres, or 9 percent of
its farmland. Travel down Route 47 in Sunderland and you can
see cul-de-sacs of new houses sprouting where corn used to
grow.
The
intrusion of suburban values and expectations
may be the biggest threat to the rural way of life.
Others
have put their land in the state's Agricultural Preservation
Restriction program, which gives them tax breaks in exchange
for keeping the land in farming. Or they have worked with
the Ashfield-based Franklin Land Trust, a nonprofit group
that has protected hundreds of acres of land from development.
But even this seeming good news has a consequence: Such protection
takes land off the tax rolls and ultimately drives up the
cost of housing.
A
failure to communicate
It's
a familiar refrain in Franklin County--heck, it is a strand
in the DNA of our regional identity--that Beacon Hill just
doesn't understand us. It's partly a problem of geography:
How many legislators have even been to, say, Charlemont or
Sunderland? It's the same kind of gap you see in states like
New York, where the rural and the urban co-exist. But usually
one or the other has the upper hand, and no one in Franklin
County has any illusions about where the Massachusetts power
lies.
"There
are more people who represent Boston than there are [those]
who represent the four counties of western Massachusetts,"
says state Sen. Stanley Rosenberg (D-Amherst).
One
of the biggest sticking points for local governments is the
formula for state aid for schools. Billions of dollars have
flowed since the 1993 Education Reform Act, but in a way that
former Shelburne selectman Stan Gawle says favors densely
populated urban and suburban districts at the expense of scattered
regional ones. "Ed deform," he calls it.
"When
they did the formula, they didn't recognize the distance we
had to travel or economy of scale," he says. "For every full-time
principal, they say you have to have 300 kids, and that doesn't
work in rural areas. You just can't bus kids from Ashfield
to Heath."
Some
towns end up spending as much as 70 percent of their municipal
budgets on schools. The problem has so exasperated Rosenberg
that he sponsored a regional school funding study in the fiscal
2002 Senate budget. But it will take more than a study to
cover the cost of education in isolated rural districts.
Roads
and highways are another perennial issue. Gawle was reprimanded
by then-Gov. Paul Cellucci's office for referring to a certain
highway project as "The Big Pig," but he was speaking for
most of his neighbors, who suspect that all our road money
has stayed in Boston. When The Boston Globe reported
last summer that US Rep. John Olver, who represents Franklin
County and much of the surrounding rural territory, was doing
his best to hog new federal transportation dollars for his
own district, that struck folks out here as nothing more than
simple justice.
After
all, Route 2, Franklin County's direct route to Boston, is,
in parts, a dangerously poor excuse for a highway. In some
two-lane stretches in Erving, the road veers perilously close
to the Millers River. Several improvement plans have been
proposed over the years, but only recently have state officials
shown much interest in fixing it. State Highway Commissioner
Matthew Amorello wryly observed, to the Greenfield Recorder,
that Route 2 is the road the governor takes to work. Maybe
that explains it.
There
are other, smaller issues on which the folks in power back
east just don't seem to be that helpful. For instance, Debbie
Barton-Duprey would like to be able to sell Family Farms milk
to the Mohawk Trail Regional School District, but state law
requires that the contract go to the lowest bidder. State
Rep. Steven Kulik (D-Worthington) is co-sponsoring legislation
that would allow public institutions some leeway in buying
locally grown foodstuffs, even if they're not at the lowest
price.
Then
there's the need for the far-flung, sparsely settled towns
of the Massachusetts hinterlands to work together on a regional
basis. Once upon a time, there were county governments that
provided common services. But the pols in Boston, led by then-Gov.
Bill Weld, decided that counties were outmoded patronage havens--unlike,
say, the MDC or MBTA--and dismantled them. So now we have
the Franklin Regional Council of Governments--of which Stan
Gawle is a member--formed by the towns, to do pretty much
the same thing, at least in terms of regional planning and
economic development.
One
obstacle to progress is home grown.
But
John Waite says one of the biggest obstacles to regional progress
is home grown: the Yankee tradition of home rule. The best-laid
plans for regional progress can always be trumped by spats
between towns. "Right now there's an issue because three different
towns want to start an industrial park," says Waite. "There
are a lot of things that it's better to work as a group, and
because of home rule, it's not so easy. People who've lived
here their whole lives tend to get stubborn."
Stubborn
or not, those who love the place for its quality of life often
want to keep it just as it is now, and that, for better or
worse, makes it unlikely that any large-scale industry or
commercial development will take hold in the region. If Franklin
County's past was built on manufacturing and farming, its
future is more likely to be as a bedroom community for Amherst-Northampton
and Springfield. For locals, this will mean more Scandinavian
vehicles on our roads, rising property values, higher taxes,
and difficult choices at town meeting. It's a pattern that
has happened all over Massachusetts. Like everything else,
it just took longer to get to Franklin County.
Last
week a friend told me a story about a house in Ashfield that
sold for several thousand dollars more than the asking price.
The buyer, from Northampton, offered more because he wanted
to be sure he got the house. Maybe things aren't so different
out here after all.
2001
Copyright / Commonwealth Magazine
|